While you purchase one thing, normally it is best to get what you buy inside a sure diploma of expectations. While you don’t, then that will be like dishonest, wouldn’t you say? The opposite day we heard a disturbing report of how Western Digital was apparently bait and switching its SSDs, the place evaluation items provided up the marketed efficiency, however the precise items didn’t.
It was reported then that different SSD makers like Adata, Essential, and Patriot had been additionally discovered to have executed the identical factor, and now it seems to be like we would be capable to add Samsung to that listing. That is based on a report from Computerbase.de who noticed a video on YouTube in Chinese language the place it compares two seemingly equivalent Samsung 970 EVO Plus SSDs.
On the floor, each drives look like comparable, together with all its figuring out textual content and labels. Nonetheless, the older drive has the mannequin quantity MZVLB1T0HBLR, whereas the newer one has the mannequin quantity MZVL21T0HBLU. They then peeled again the stickers and found that beneath, it was a distinct story.
The older mannequin makes use of the Phoenix drive whereas the newer one makes use of an Elpis drive. Efficiency smart, the benchmarks present that on some fronts, each drives are equivalent, however on different checks, the one with the Elpis one performs far worse.
Earlier reviews had attributed the chip scarcity as one of many the explanation why SSD makers have needed to search out options to sure parts, however the lack of transparency is what’s bothering many individuals, particularly if these drives don’t dwell as much as their marketed claims.
Filed in. Learn extra about Samsung. Supply: extremetech