Whose fault is it that the primary era of U.S. sensible meters haven’t lived as much as their potential? And the way can the following era keep away from repeating the identical errors?
“The monitor report on AMI is a combined bag,” Alicia Barton, CEO of FirstLight Energy and former CEO of the New York State Power Analysis and Growth Company (NYSERDA), stated in an interview. “I believe there are plenty of locations within the cleantech area the place we’ve lived that have — plenty of hype, after which the belief that it hasn’t fairly lived as much as the expectations.”
It’s a bit too straightforward responsible this state of affairs solely on utilities, nonetheless. To make sure, some have overpromised sensible meter capabilities that occur to lie exterior their main enterprise case of automated billing and different “money register” capabilities. However regulators that approve or deny AMI enterprise instances — and the regulatory constructions that set up that exercise — even have a job to play.
A 2020 report from the U.S. Division of Power highlighted the challenges dealing with utility regulators in assessing the prices and advantages of AMI investments with “identifiable prices, however unsure future advantages.” These proceedings are difficult by the truth that they envision large-scale modifications to the standard position of the utility, from a provider of electrical energy to an orchestrator of customer-owned DERs.
That’s why Barton is happy about new regulatory approaches to contemplate the potential advantages of next-generation sensible meters, or “AMI 2.zero” in trade parlance.