Are demand response suppliers short-changing California utilities and prospects by claiming funds for providers it could possibly’t ship, and leaving the state topic to future grid instability?

Or, are the state’s market guidelines and rules shortchanging demand response corporations and prospects, and undermining essentially the most cost-effective device for future grid reliability? 

This dispute between state power regulators and the demand response trade has develop into a flashpoint in California’s efforts to stop a repeat of the grid emergencies and rolling blackouts of August 2020 within the coming summer season. 

And it’s not clear that the information out there can definitively show which standpoint is the right one — except, maybe, extra subtle strategies can present a solution. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *