AMD RX 6600 XT

MSRP $379.00

“The AMD RX 6600 XT is a strong 1080p card in a time when GPU choices are few and much between.”


Easy gaming at 1080p

Would not require plenty of energy

Able to 1440p gaming

Help for FidelityFX Tremendous Decision


Just a little too costly

Lackluster content material creation efficiency

Poor ray tracing efficiency

Price range and 1080p players haven’t had plenty of graphics card choices over the previous a number of months, and AMD’s new RX 6600 XT is trying to remedy that drawback. It’s a card able to delivering easy 1080p gaming at excessive refresh charges, and it makes use of a cut-down core to assist alleviate some provide points. However its value stretches the definition of what it means to be a price range graphics card.

Under $500, AMD might have priced the RX 6600 XT nearly anyplace and nonetheless promote playing cards like there’s no tomorrow. At $379, it nestles into a snug place between the Nvidia competitors, and should you can seize one at launch for record value, you gained’t discover one other card that performs as properly for the associated fee.

However do you have to? $379 is a lovely value given the present market situations, however the RX 6600 XT nonetheless must stack up the competitors as soon as the launch growth is gone. The Radeon RX 6600 XT is a strong card, but it surely’s flanked by two glorious playing cards from Crew Inexperienced that give it a run for its cash.


AMD isn’t releasing a reference design for the RX 6600 XT, so that you’re restricted to choices from board companions. For this assessment, I obtained my arms on MSI’s RX 6600 XT Gaming X card, which makes use of a standard dual-fan design.

AMD has shared designs from different companions, a few of which embrace three followers, however most ought to include two. Whatever the mannequin, the RX 6600 XT makes use of a single Eight-pin energy connector and requires a 500W energy provide at a minimal.

My unit measured 10.88 inches lengthy, accounting for the marginally protruding shroud. Each mannequin is a bit of completely different — particularly the triple-fan ones — so ensure that to examine earlier than selecting one up. A regular dual-fan design shouldn’t be longer than the size of an ATX motherboard (12 inches).

All through testing, the cardboard stayed cool, peaking at round 62 levels Celsius in Cyberpunk 2077. It’s vital to say that I examined inside a Be quiet! Darkish Base Professional 900 rev. 2, which is a full tower chassis with a bit of additional room for cooling. Your mileage might differ.

A welcome characteristic on my assessment unit was a backplate, which is one thing the competing RTX 3060 I examined lacked. At the very least one board associate design has a backplate primarily based on the pictures AMD offered, however that will not be true for all designs.


The RX 6600 XT builds on AMD’s current RDNA 2 structure, which we have now already seen in motion again and again. Nevertheless, it’s constructed utilizing the Navi 23 GPU core, which is in any other case solely obtainable in AMD’s workstation-class Radeon Professional W6600 and W6600M. That is the Navi 23’s debut for the patron desktop crowd.

An vital factor to notice about Navi 23 in comparison with earlier variations: It’s a lot smaller. Which means AMD can squeeze extra GPU dies onto a wafer, which ought to assist provide. It’s nonetheless constructed utilizing chipmaker TSMC’s 7nm node, however with a smaller measurement, AMD is ready to crank out extra chips with every manufacturing cross.

Compute Items
Shading models
Recreation Pace
Increase pace
Reminiscence capability
Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon RX 6800
Radeon RX 6800 XT
Radeon RX 6900 XT

Regardless, Navi 23 is constructed on AMD’s current structure, so we are able to draw loads of comparisons to the remainder of the vary. In comparison with the subsequent step up, the RX 6600 XT sheds round 20% of the compute models (CUs) for a 20% distinction in value. That may make sense with all different specs equal, however they’re not. The RX 6600 XT matches the enhance clock pace of the RX 6700 XT, but it surely comes with 4GB much less GDDR6 reminiscence.

The RX 6600 XT reveals a good worth in comparison with related gaps within the vary.

Nonetheless, it’s higher than another steps within the vary. Transferring down from an RX 6800 to an RX 6700 XT, there’s a few 20% value distinction for a 40% distinction in CUs — and that step additionally drops 4GB of RAM. At the very least by AMD’s personal lineup, the RX 6600 XT reveals a good worth in comparison with related gaps within the vary.

There isn’t a lot of a purpose to attract comparisons to Nvidia on the specs entrance — I’ll dig into the higher model within the upcoming sections. Nevertheless, it’s vital to level out the value of the RX 6600 XT in comparison with the competitors. At $380, it’s sandwiched between Nvidia’s RTX 3060 at $330 and the RTX 3060 Ti at $400.

The RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8GB of reminiscence, too, whereas the RTX 3060 comes with 12GB. With costs in thoughts, the trail ahead is obvious. The RX 6600 XT ought to carry out barely under an RTX 3060 Ti and round 20% decrease than the RX 6700 XT. However does it?


The RX 6600 XT is focusing on 1080p, excessive refresh charge displays. And primarily based on my common body charges, it hits that mark properly. Throughout the 5 non-ray tracing video games I examined, it averaged 117.6 frames per second (fps), making it an amazing choice for 1080p displays with a 144Hz refresh charge. The 1440p efficiency is just barely worse with a mean of 86.6 fps.

Earlier than attending to particular person outcomes, it’s value wanting on the averages I gathered. At 1080p, the RX 6600 XT rests between the RTX 3060 Ti and RTX 3060 the place it ought to, barely exceeding the efficiency of last-gen’s RX 5700 XT. There’s a few 10% distinction between the RX 6600 XT and its closest competitor in value, the RTX 3060 Ti.

1440p confirmed related outcomes, although with a bigger 18% distinction between the RTX 3060 Ti and RX 6600 XT. The RTX 3060 and RX 6600 XT had been a lot nearer with solely a 6% distinction. In fact, averages like this don’t inform the complete story, so let’s stroll by some particular person exams for a clearer image.

I examined the RX 6600 XT with a machine rocking an Intel Core i9-10900Okay, 32GB of RAM, and an Asus Tuf Z490-Plus motherboard. All of my exams had been run off a Essential MX500 2TB onerous drive with the most recent model of Home windows 10. Sadly, I didn’t have an AMD processor to check Sensible Entry Reminiscence, however you’ll be able to anticipate a lift of 5-10% in supported video games you probably have a current Ryzen processor.

Beginning with essentially the most simple combat, the RX 6600 XT took house a GPU rating of 9,644 in 3DMark Time Spy. That’s about 11% sooner than RX 5700 XT and RTX 3060, which scored inside a degree of one another on this check. As you’ll see in different exams, the RX 6600 XT will get near the RX 5700 XT in most video games. Right here, it really shoots forward.

The RTX 3060 Ti places the RX 6600 XT again as a substitute, nonetheless. It earned a graphics rating of 11,706 — a few 19% distinction. That’s true of the RX 6700 XT, too, which took the crown in 3DMark with a graphics rating of 12,068.

Murderer’s Creed Valhalla is without doubt one of the video games that favored the RX 6600 XT over the RTX 3060 Ti . At 1080p with Extremely Excessive settings, the RX 6600 XT earned a mean of 83 fps. That’s inside one body of the RX 5700 XT, however nonetheless 5 frames forward of the RTX 3060 Ti. The RTX 3060 and RTX 2060 Tremendous trailed the pack at 64 fps and 66 fps, respectively, whereas the RX 6700 XT as soon as once more got here out on prime at 100 fps.

At 1440p Extremely Excessive, the RX 6600 XT and RTX 3060 Ti traded locations. The AMD card got here in at 60 fps whereas the Nvidia one got here in at 64 fps. The RTX 3060 was markedly decrease at 51 fps, whereas the RX 6700 XT nonetheless confirmed its dominance at 76 fps. At Excessive settings, I discovered related outcomes, with the RX 6600 XT outpacing the RTX 3060 Ti at 1080p however falling brief at 1440p.

The Vulkan-based Purple Useless Redemption 2 painted a barely completely different image, with the RX 6600 XT performing nearer to the RTX 3060. The RX 6600 XT averaged 68 fps at 1080p Extremely High quality, whereas the RTX 3060 averaged 65 fps. The RTX 3060 Ti confirmed a 21% distinction in comparison with the RX 6600 XT, averaging 84 fps.

I noticed related efficiency at 1440p Extremely High quality, with the RTX 3060 Ti main the pack at 70 fps. The RX 6600 XT confirmed a 24% distinction in comparison with the RTX 3060 Ti with a mean body charge of 55 fps. Like at 1080p, the RTX 3060 solely barely trailed the RX 6600 XT with a four% distinction between them.

AMD made good on its promise to ship 1080p gaming with excessive body charges.

Civilization VI as soon as once more confirmed a commanding lead for the RTX 3060 Ti, although the RX 6600 XT obtained nearer than it did in Purple Useless Redemption 2. The RX 6600 XT averaged 161 fps at 1080p Extremely settings, whereas the RTX 3060 Ti averaged 194 fps, which is a few 19% distinction. The RX 6700 XT shot forward of the opposite playing cards with a 219 fps common.

I noticed related scaling at 1440p Extremely. The RX 6600 XT earned 137 fps and the RTX 3060 Ti earned 163 fps, whereas the RTX 3060 trailed at 119 fps. Right here, the RX 6600 XT matches into the spot it ought to — proper in between the RTX 3060 Ti and RTX 3060.

Battlefield V produced related outcomes. The RX 6600 XT averaged 139 fps at 1080p Extremely settings. The RTX 3060 confirmed a 12% distinction at 123 fps, and the RTX 3060 Ti confirmed a 9% distinction at 152 fps. The RX 6700 XT as soon as once more got here out on prime at 164 fps.

At 1440p Extremely settings, the RTX 3060 Ti pushed even additional forward of the RX 6600 XT. AMD’s card averaged 100 fps and Nvidia’s averaged 123 fps — virtually a 21% distinction. The RTX 3060 was near the RX 6600 XT at 97 fps, whereas last-gen’s RX 5700 XT scored a barely increased 110 fps.

Fortnite confirmed a tighter race between the RX 6600 XT, RTX 3060, and RTX 3060 Ti. The RTX 3060 Ti lead at 1080p Epic settings at 143 fps, however the RX 6600 XT wasn’t far behind at 137 fps (solely a four% distinction). The RTX 3060 trailed the group at 132 fps. All three playing cards scored far above the RTX 2060 Tremendous and RX 5700 XT — each of which by no means broke 110 fps —  exhibiting some clear enhancements from the earlier technology.

The 1440p Epic confirmed a extra commanding lead for the RTX 3060 Ti, the place it averaged 100 fps. That’s about 21% off the RX 6600 XT, which averaged 81 fps. The RTX 3060 is a greater level of comparability to the RX 6600 XT at 1440p with its 86 fps common.

Total, you’ll be able to anticipate a few 10% distinction in efficiency between the RX 6600 XT and the RTX 3060 playing cards, stacking in the best way their costs would recommend. At 1080p, you’re buying and selling a few 5% distinction in value for a 10% distinction in efficiency between the RTX 3060 Ti and RX 6600 XT. Bringing within the RTX 3060, it’s a 14% distinction in value for about an 11% distinction in efficiency.

Inside AMD’s personal vary, the RX 6600 XT performs because it ought to given the specs. Even with the reminiscence hole between the 2 playing cards, the RX 6700 XT and RX 6600 XT present a few 20% distinction.

After I carry within the earlier technology, nonetheless, the RX 6600 XT reveals some issues. The RX 6600 XT solely barely outclassed the RX 5700 XT in my exams, which launched two years in the past for $399. The RX 6600 XT is just $20 cheaper and solely barely extra highly effective. It contains ray tracing, which the RX 5700 XT lacked, however this isn’t precisely the generational enchancment I’d have appreciated to see.

Nonetheless, AMD made good on its promise to ship 1080p gaming with excessive body charges, even when there are some barely higher choices from Nvidia at record costs.

Content material creation

Gaming is the concentrate on the RX 6600 XT, so it’s not shocking that the cardboard takes a backseat in the case of content material creation. Right here, I ran exams utilizing Blender’s benchmark and PugetBench for Premiere Professional. The RX 6600 XT is able to working each packages, however there is likely to be a greater choice should you’re centered on them greater than gaming.

In Blender, I ran three check renders and averaged the instances. The RTX 3060 Ti unsurprisingly leads with help for CUDA and OptiX rendering in Blender. The RX 6600 XT nonetheless managed to beat out the RTX 3060, nonetheless, with about an 11% distinction between them. Nonetheless, the RTX 3060 Ti and RX 6700 XT confirmed a transparent lead.

PugetBench for Premiere Professional favored the Nvidia playing cards much more. The RX 6600 XT scored final with an general rating of 625, whereas the RTX 3060 Ti scored 807. Remember the fact that PugetBench takes under consideration a bunch of capabilities in Premiere Professional, so the ultimate rating isn’t solely on the shoulders of the graphics card.

I used to be shocked to see the RX 6600 XT present up a bit in my Blender check, however general, it’s not an amazing card for content material creation. It’s highly effective sufficient to perform in apps like Blender and Premiere Professional, however should you use these functions so much, Nvidia nonetheless holds the lead.

Tremendous Decision and ray tracing

Usually, Nvidia would have a transparent lead over AMD with Deep Studying Tremendous Sampling (DLSS) and ray tracing. That’s not the case for this technology. The RX 6600 XT additionally comes with hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and it has entry to a DLSS-like characteristic within the type of FidelityFX Tremendous Decision (FSR).

I took to Management and Cyberpunk 2077 to check ray tracing. I ignored DLSS for the entire exams to see how the RX 6600 XT would maintain up in a good battle. True to different playing cards within the RX 6000 vary, it fell clearly in need of the Nvidia competitors.

In Cyberpunk 2077, the RX 6600 XT confirmed a few 79% drop when shifting from the Extremely preset to the Extremely RT preset, whereas the RTX 3060 solely confirmed a 53% drop. Bear in mind that is with DLSS off. Even with out an upscaling benefit, Nvidia’s RTX 30-series playing cards deal with ray tracing higher than the RX 6000-series.

1440p Extremely RT was unplayable throughout all of the playing cards I examined. For reference, the RX 6600 XT averaged solely three fps on this mode. The highest-performing card, the RTX 3060 Ti, averaged solely 23 fps.

Ray tracing is demanding whatever the you apply it to, however Nvidia’s playing cards can nonetheless deal with the warmth higher than AMD’s.

Management was way more forgiving. It’s not less than playable with ray tracing turned on at 1080p, however the RX 6600 XT nonetheless confirmed a 54% drop, and the RTX 3060 confirmed solely a 38% drop.

At 1440p, the RX 6600 XT dropped by 62% with ray tracing turned on — 47 fps to 18 fps — whereas the RTX 3060 dropped by 40%. I used the RTX 3060 as a degree of comparability as a result of it was the closest competitor in these exams, however the RTX 3060 Ti confirmed related drops when turning on ray tracing.

The distinction right here is smart. Nvidia makes use of devoted ray-tracing cores, whereas AMD opts for a “ray accelerator” packed into every compute unit. Ray tracing is demanding whatever the you apply it to, however Nvidia’s playing cards can nonetheless deal with the warmth higher than AMD’s — and the RX 6600 XT doesn’t change that.

Within the case of an Nvidia card, I’d level to DLSS as a method to enhance ray tracing efficiency. AMD has another within the type of FSR, however Nvidia normally bundles ray tracing with DLSS, whereas FSR is a bit of in every single place. That would change down the road, however Nvidia’s playing cards nonetheless have the most effective set of options for ray tracing.

As my exams present, you really want an upscaling characteristic to run ray tracing at playable body charges. AMD has that characteristic now within the type of FSR, however many well-liked ray tracing titles — Cyberpunk 2077 and Management included — don’t help the characteristic but.

Nonetheless, FSR is out there to you with the RX 6600 XT. As we present in our FidelityFX Tremendous Decision assessment, it’s a really succesful upscaling characteristic that may severely enhance your body charges. The picture high quality isn’t fairly nearly as good as DLSS, however the variations are straightforward to forgive as soon as every thing is up and working.

Our take

In an ideal world with record costs and GPUs on retailer cabinets, I’d actually suggest the RTX 3060 Ti over the RX 6600 XT. It’s solely $20 dearer and virtually universally performs higher. The RX 6600 XT is barely overpriced at $380 — given its efficiency, it ought to clock in nearer to $350. Nevertheless, an additional $30 is difficult to argue with given how costly graphics playing cards are proper now.

Loads of that is going to come back right down to what card you could find, and for what value. At launch for record value, the RX 6600 XT is a slam dunk given the going charge of graphics playing cards. As soon as the preliminary inventory is gone, you need to slot the RX 6600 XT in between the RTX 3060 Ti and RTX 3060 when it comes to efficiency and take the asking value from there.

Is there a greater different?

Sure, the RTX 3060 Ti is a greater different. Nevertheless, given the costs of graphics playing cards and the problem find them, the record value doesn’t imply a lot. If the RX 6600 XT value finally ends up between the RTX 3060 and RTX 3060 Ti, it’s an amazing 1080p card for top refresh charge displays.

The opposite different is the RX 6700 XT, which outclasses even the RTX 3060 Ti, although at a premium.

How lengthy will it final?

The RX 6600 XT ought to final for the subsequent a number of years for 1080p gaming. If you wish to use options like ray tracing or improve to the next decision, you’ll in all probability really feel the weaknesses of the RX 6600 XT inside a couple of years.

Do you have to purchase it?

Sure. The RX 6600 XT is about $30 too costly, but it surely’s nonetheless less expensive than another card you should buy proper now. If you happen to miss the launch growth, nonetheless, take into account upgrading to the RTX 3060 Ti as an alternative if you could find it for a good value.

Editors’ Suggestions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *